During the period of high oil prices, China's participation in international oil economic business cooperation should establish a new response. In light of the increasingly complex current situation of the oil game, the three core elements of the game dilemma should be resolved, namely information exchange, benefit sharing and risk response, and international cooperation should be actively promoted.
The soaring oil prices affect all aspects of the economy, which has profoundly changed human production and the way of life. It also affects the expectations of governments and peoples in various countries. The continuously changing oil price has also caused the balance of interests between big oil-producing countries and big oil-consuming countries to continue to be broken. The various relations triggered by oil supply and demand have also become more subtle and elusive.
The decline in the negotiating status of oil importing countries High oil prices have caused a qualitative change in the negotiating position between oil supply and demand. As oil prices are expected to change, oil-producing countries as suppliers often take a more proactive position in the negotiations with oil-importing countries. A typical example is the energy-charter proposal put forward by Russia to the EU-8 meeting in June 2006, which was rejected by Russia. Not only that, but in recent years, Russia has also proposed a series of new constraints to oil importing countries that are engaged in petroleum economic trade. They are required to enter the other side's downstream market and obtain certain income rights or control rights, such as equity in the oil and gas retail market. As a condition for these countries to enter their own upstream oil and gas exploration market. If there is no positive response, it is necessary to prevent other countries from entering their own oil and gas exploration market. Russia has been able to put forward a series of harsh conditions with a hard-line attitude precisely because of its high oil prices. When Russia pays more attention to oil and gas resources and strengthens control, the energy charters of the eight countries in the EU suggest that eating closed doors is completely unexpected.
The current widespread phenomenon is that with the rise in oil prices, oil importing countries have encountered more problems and difficulties in international oil and gas economic transactions, and negotiations with oil-producing countries have also become more difficult. As it is impossible to accurately grasp the future price of oil and gas and find no equilibrium, the parties to negotiations, especially resource countries, will be hesitant and cautious. For example, in the negotiation of energy import with Russia, some oil and gas projects were involved in the negotiation. The price that Russia insists is far higher than the domestic level, which has caused the project operation to be blocked for a time.
The tightening and opening-up policy of oil-producing countries Another striking feature under the background of high oil prices is the universality of the shrinking of the oil opening policy of the world's oil-producing countries. The emergence of this phenomenon is mainly due to the influence of two factors.
On the one hand, under the background of high oil prices, it is possible for resource-country governments to rely on oil trade and higher tax revenues to meet their fiscal revenue targets. The incentives to use the means of opening up and attracting funds to improve the state of fiscal revenues will not be so strong and therefore high. To a certain extent, oil prices have prompted the governments of oil-producing countries to implement tight oil opening policies with certainty. At present, the fact that some oil-producing countries in Latin America and Africa have tightened the domestic oil exploration and development market to different degrees is illustrative of the problem.
On the other hand, high oil prices have increased the political sensitivities of oil. The world’s oil-rich countries are mostly developing countries. Many oil-producing countries are turbulent in domestic political situations. High-priced oil will undoubtedly attract more political forces and factions. "Eyeball", oil can easily become the trigger of the dispute. For the sake of stabilizing the domestic situation, the government of the resource country will have to consider political factors and domestic nationalist sentiments when it comes to oil transactions with foreign companies or governments, not just economic interests.
High oil prices make petroleum more and more political, and the opening of the oil market is also subject to more political factors. From the principle of economics, we can know that supply and price are often proportional, but in the international oil market dominated by high oil prices, especially in the upstream mining market, the increase in the political attributes of oil makes the failure of this law universal.
The oil game is more complex and changeable. It is no doubt that the developed world, both developed and developing countries, regards petroleum as an important strategic material. From the perspective of supply, oil and gas resources in the world are relatively concentrated, and oil consumption in most countries is achieved in varying degrees with external forces from the international market. For the purpose of satisfying economic development, many countries have formulated different forms of development strategies for participating in the international oil exploration and development market business. There is no doubt that high oil prices make the game between oil consuming countries and oil producing countries more and more complicated.
In the context of high oil prices, the oil game has become a multidimensional space game influenced by many factors, and the results are often extremely unstable. Looking at the history of the use of petroleum by humans, we can see that through the game of oil control rights, countries around the world have spawned a series of new things such as oil weapons, petroleum wars, petroleum dollars, oil banks, and petroleum finance. At the same time, various countries through the participation in the game of oil control objectively enabled the emergence and transformation of various forms of international political relations, international economic and trade forms, international financial instruments, and national economic development models. In short, with the gradual reduction of reserves caused by the exploitation of global oil and the arrival of the era of high oil prices, the arduous and difficult game surrounding the oil issue will continue to show itself to the world, and no one can escape this phenomenon.
Calling for a new type of oil cooperation relationship Similar to the situation in most countries in the world, China has also formulated a strategy for overseas development going abroad. Since 1993, after 15 years of baptism, China National Petroleum Corporation has achieved fruitful results. In 2006, China Petroleum’s overseas equity oil production reached 28 million tons, and Sinopec’s equity oil reached 6 million tons. With the sustained and healthy development of China’s economy, CNPC’s social responsibilities will increase, and it will also be objectively required to accelerate the pace of “going globalâ€. The realization of such goals will naturally be accompanied by high oil prices. The impact and impact of various unfavorable factors. Therefore, how to resolve the game difficulties with oil-producing countries is also a realistic issue that cannot be avoided.
During the period of high oil prices, China's participation in international oil economic business cooperation should establish a new response. In light of the increasingly complex current situation of the oil game, the three core elements of the game dilemma should be resolved, namely information exchange, benefit sharing and risk response, and international cooperation should be actively promoted.
First, establish coordination mechanisms and information exchange channels between countries, strengthen diplomatic contacts, conduct in-depth investigations of national conditions and world oil information collection, timely grasp the world oil production dynamics, minimize the occurrence of information asymmetries, and import the Overseas oil production provides timely and accurate information.
Secondly, we should conduct economic exchanges with oil-producing countries on the basis of the principles and principles of mutual benefit and win-win outcomes. We must allow oil-producing countries to feel that the oil cooperation with China in terms of trade or production is profitable. In this regard, we must come up with practical measures. Measures. For example, relying on China’s huge oil downstream market to implement a market-for-resources strategy is a good path choice. It has a strong attraction for Middle Eastern countries and can actively try and expand.
Third, we should review the situation and strengthen overseas risk research. In today's increasingly complex oil game, it is necessary to strengthen risk management and research. In particular, the analysis and evaluation in the early stage are more essential to avoiding risks and reducing losses. It should be noted that Chinese companies will face a series of risks when entering the overseas oil and gas markets. They should strengthen research and assessment of petroleum-related political, economic, and military risks, and provide them with “going out†strategies.
The soaring oil prices affect all aspects of the economy, which has profoundly changed human production and the way of life. It also affects the expectations of governments and peoples in various countries. The continuously changing oil price has also caused the balance of interests between big oil-producing countries and big oil-consuming countries to continue to be broken. The various relations triggered by oil supply and demand have also become more subtle and elusive.
The decline in the negotiating status of oil importing countries High oil prices have caused a qualitative change in the negotiating position between oil supply and demand. As oil prices are expected to change, oil-producing countries as suppliers often take a more proactive position in the negotiations with oil-importing countries. A typical example is the energy-charter proposal put forward by Russia to the EU-8 meeting in June 2006, which was rejected by Russia. Not only that, but in recent years, Russia has also proposed a series of new constraints to oil importing countries that are engaged in petroleum economic trade. They are required to enter the other side's downstream market and obtain certain income rights or control rights, such as equity in the oil and gas retail market. As a condition for these countries to enter their own upstream oil and gas exploration market. If there is no positive response, it is necessary to prevent other countries from entering their own oil and gas exploration market. Russia has been able to put forward a series of harsh conditions with a hard-line attitude precisely because of its high oil prices. When Russia pays more attention to oil and gas resources and strengthens control, the energy charters of the eight countries in the EU suggest that eating closed doors is completely unexpected.
The current widespread phenomenon is that with the rise in oil prices, oil importing countries have encountered more problems and difficulties in international oil and gas economic transactions, and negotiations with oil-producing countries have also become more difficult. As it is impossible to accurately grasp the future price of oil and gas and find no equilibrium, the parties to negotiations, especially resource countries, will be hesitant and cautious. For example, in the negotiation of energy import with Russia, some oil and gas projects were involved in the negotiation. The price that Russia insists is far higher than the domestic level, which has caused the project operation to be blocked for a time.
The tightening and opening-up policy of oil-producing countries Another striking feature under the background of high oil prices is the universality of the shrinking of the oil opening policy of the world's oil-producing countries. The emergence of this phenomenon is mainly due to the influence of two factors.
On the one hand, under the background of high oil prices, it is possible for resource-country governments to rely on oil trade and higher tax revenues to meet their fiscal revenue targets. The incentives to use the means of opening up and attracting funds to improve the state of fiscal revenues will not be so strong and therefore high. To a certain extent, oil prices have prompted the governments of oil-producing countries to implement tight oil opening policies with certainty. At present, the fact that some oil-producing countries in Latin America and Africa have tightened the domestic oil exploration and development market to different degrees is illustrative of the problem.
On the other hand, high oil prices have increased the political sensitivities of oil. The world’s oil-rich countries are mostly developing countries. Many oil-producing countries are turbulent in domestic political situations. High-priced oil will undoubtedly attract more political forces and factions. "Eyeball", oil can easily become the trigger of the dispute. For the sake of stabilizing the domestic situation, the government of the resource country will have to consider political factors and domestic nationalist sentiments when it comes to oil transactions with foreign companies or governments, not just economic interests.
High oil prices make petroleum more and more political, and the opening of the oil market is also subject to more political factors. From the principle of economics, we can know that supply and price are often proportional, but in the international oil market dominated by high oil prices, especially in the upstream mining market, the increase in the political attributes of oil makes the failure of this law universal.
The oil game is more complex and changeable. It is no doubt that the developed world, both developed and developing countries, regards petroleum as an important strategic material. From the perspective of supply, oil and gas resources in the world are relatively concentrated, and oil consumption in most countries is achieved in varying degrees with external forces from the international market. For the purpose of satisfying economic development, many countries have formulated different forms of development strategies for participating in the international oil exploration and development market business. There is no doubt that high oil prices make the game between oil consuming countries and oil producing countries more and more complicated.
In the context of high oil prices, the oil game has become a multidimensional space game influenced by many factors, and the results are often extremely unstable. Looking at the history of the use of petroleum by humans, we can see that through the game of oil control rights, countries around the world have spawned a series of new things such as oil weapons, petroleum wars, petroleum dollars, oil banks, and petroleum finance. At the same time, various countries through the participation in the game of oil control objectively enabled the emergence and transformation of various forms of international political relations, international economic and trade forms, international financial instruments, and national economic development models. In short, with the gradual reduction of reserves caused by the exploitation of global oil and the arrival of the era of high oil prices, the arduous and difficult game surrounding the oil issue will continue to show itself to the world, and no one can escape this phenomenon.
Calling for a new type of oil cooperation relationship Similar to the situation in most countries in the world, China has also formulated a strategy for overseas development going abroad. Since 1993, after 15 years of baptism, China National Petroleum Corporation has achieved fruitful results. In 2006, China Petroleum’s overseas equity oil production reached 28 million tons, and Sinopec’s equity oil reached 6 million tons. With the sustained and healthy development of China’s economy, CNPC’s social responsibilities will increase, and it will also be objectively required to accelerate the pace of “going globalâ€. The realization of such goals will naturally be accompanied by high oil prices. The impact and impact of various unfavorable factors. Therefore, how to resolve the game difficulties with oil-producing countries is also a realistic issue that cannot be avoided.
During the period of high oil prices, China's participation in international oil economic business cooperation should establish a new response. In light of the increasingly complex current situation of the oil game, the three core elements of the game dilemma should be resolved, namely information exchange, benefit sharing and risk response, and international cooperation should be actively promoted.
First, establish coordination mechanisms and information exchange channels between countries, strengthen diplomatic contacts, conduct in-depth investigations of national conditions and world oil information collection, timely grasp the world oil production dynamics, minimize the occurrence of information asymmetries, and import the Overseas oil production provides timely and accurate information.
Secondly, we should conduct economic exchanges with oil-producing countries on the basis of the principles and principles of mutual benefit and win-win outcomes. We must allow oil-producing countries to feel that the oil cooperation with China in terms of trade or production is profitable. In this regard, we must come up with practical measures. Measures. For example, relying on China’s huge oil downstream market to implement a market-for-resources strategy is a good path choice. It has a strong attraction for Middle Eastern countries and can actively try and expand.
Third, we should review the situation and strengthen overseas risk research. In today's increasingly complex oil game, it is necessary to strengthen risk management and research. In particular, the analysis and evaluation in the early stage are more essential to avoiding risks and reducing losses. It should be noted that Chinese companies will face a series of risks when entering the overseas oil and gas markets. They should strengthen research and assessment of petroleum-related political, economic, and military risks, and provide them with “going out†strategies.
HDPE or LDPE Plastic Apron is commonly used in Kitchen, Bakery, Food processing, Supermarket, Medical Examination, DIY, Hotel, Restaurant, Beauty Salon, Haircut, Hair Dyeing, Hospital Lab, retail store, shopping mall, grocery stores, daily household etc.
Size: Various sizes according to the customers' requirement
Color: Transparent or colorful
Features: Disposal, Single-use, Waterproof, Food Grade material, Non-toxic
Surface Dealing:Plain or embossed
Printing: Customized
PVC Apron, Plastic Aprons, Disposable Plastic Aprons, Kids Disposable Aprons, Disposable PVC Aprons, Disposable Aprons
BILLION PLASTIC MANUFACTURING CO.,LTD, JIANGMEN , https://www.jmbillion-plastics.com